kaffi311
Active Member
Posts: 283
Likes: 98
1963 Shasta 16 SC
Currently Offline
|
Post by kaffi311 on Jan 19, 2019 13:29:40 GMT -8
I am trying to figure this out: The very bottom of my back skin actually sat on the bumper supports- there were no cut outs for the metal bumper supports (like in the front skins- where there are notches cut out) IMG_0618 by kathy, on Flickr However, the bottom of the side framing was actually below the bottom of the back skin. They seemed to have rectified this by adding a piece of metal to each side of the back to make up the difference. (Make sense?) You can see the bottom of the back skin here- and the added metal underneath it: IMG_0561 by kathy, on Flickr Each side in the back had this: IMG_0626 by kathy, on Flickr IMG_0623 by kathy, on Flickr I have added a piece of wood across the very bottom of the back- so I can attach the skin bottom to it. IMG_5678 by kathy, on Flickr As you can see- this piece does not match up to the framing on the sides at the bottom. IMG_5680 by kathy, on Flickr IMG_5676 by kathy, on Flickr How do I manage this difference? Would you add the metal pieces back that were there originally? Or would you cut out notches in the bottom of the back metal so that its bottom matches the bottom of the sides? I know this is hard to understand- hopefully you can see what I am asking! Thanks Kathy
|
|
|
Post by vikx on Jan 19, 2019 20:48:26 GMT -8
If notches will allow the back metal to curl under the trailer, I would notch. However, that piece may be too short to go all the way? The pieces that were there will work as well.
I'm having the same trouble with my 57 Shasta, it has no wood where I need to attach the metal underneath. I'm still working on a solution. This trailer had a "butt drag" problem and that has been remedied by moving the axle under the springs rather than on top.
In any case, you've got to protect your insulation and cover the wood back there. I'm going to add a piece of flashing in the front to prevent road splash from ruining the insulation. Maybe in the back as well.
|
|
nccamper
Administrator
Posts: 7,744
Likes: 2,871
1962 Forester- 1956 Shasta
Currently Offline
|
Post by nccamper on Jan 21, 2019 4:58:47 GMT -8
I'd use the angled pieces again. That's what I did on our 63 Shasta. They solve a problem and I think they look good.
|
|
kaffi311
Active Member
Posts: 283
Likes: 98
1963 Shasta 16 SC
Currently Offline
|
Post by kaffi311 on Jan 21, 2019 9:36:23 GMT -8
I'd use the angled pieces again. That's what I did on our 63 Shasta. They solve a problem and I think they look good. I think I jus might do that- as I did not take into account the added inches when ordering my new skins- and I doubt they will cover the extra. Have any photos of that area after you reinstalled the pieces? Thanks K
|
|
nccamper
Administrator
Posts: 7,744
Likes: 2,871
1962 Forester- 1956 Shasta
Currently Offline
|
Post by nccamper on Jan 21, 2019 11:12:21 GMT -8
It's about the only thing I didn't take a photo of finished. Here is a site with all the photos:
|
|