shastajeff
Active Member
Posts: 140
Likes: 63
1965 Shasta Compact - "Stu"
Currently Offline
|
Post by shastajeff on Jul 4, 2014 13:17:50 GMT -8
On a recent camping trip I came across a fellow camper with a 1979 camper who had done a frame off restoration. Everything had been replaced except for the frame and the stove/oven. All new everything else...wiring, interior, added a/c unit, power inverter,3 way refrigerator, heater, water pump...things that weren't original to the camper. Even new skins. Like I said, the only thing original was the frame and stove/oven. It is absolutely beautiful but is it still a 1979 vintage trailer or is it, in reality, a new 2013 (the year the work was completed)? Kind of a picky question, I know, but I was wondering what other opinions were.
|
|
lakewoodgirl
Active Member
Posts: 270
Likes: 92
1954 Lakewood
Currently Offline
|
Post by lakewoodgirl on Jul 4, 2014 14:13:15 GMT -8
Wow. That's a tough one. I wonder what the rules are for classic cars? Especially those where parts aren't easily available? I think they still consider it a restoration?
Anyway, in my humble opinion, if you can't restore most if it's original parts/furnishings/skin than I can see where it could be considered a rebuild therefore lose its claim to being vintage. My trailer so far is probably a 60/40. 60% restore/40% rebuild. But, nothing is coming off the frame. I'm hoping the further I go, the percentage will change to at least a 70/30.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
|
Post by bigbill on Jul 4, 2014 20:02:14 GMT -8
Yes if it was rebuilt to look the same then it is still a 79, adding modern appliances and up grading systems to make better and safer doesn't change the original date of manufacture. The word vintage just means the year of manufacture nothing more or nothing less. Now if it was being judged as a 100 point antique then the up grades would deduct points in its total score. Many of the nicest old trailers have had the skin replaced and I would hope all have had the wiring upgraded to a safe standard. Also if I am going to drink water from a trailer I would hope that most of the plumbing had been replaced. You have never lived until you cut up an old water tank to throw in the scrap bin and find a petrified rat in it, sure makes me wish I had been drinking or cooking from that tank!
|
|
lakewoodgirl
Active Member
Posts: 270
Likes: 92
1954 Lakewood
Currently Offline
|
Post by lakewoodgirl on Jul 4, 2014 21:12:14 GMT -8
Here's a question Shastajeff, was the VIN visible or was it missing or removed? If the VIN has been tampered with, that could have been the reason right there!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
John Palmer
Senior Member
Hi, From a vintage trailer guy located in Santa Ana, CA. It's good to see lots of activity here.
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 576
Currently Offline
|
Post by John Palmer on Jul 4, 2014 21:51:47 GMT -8
It is, whatever it says "it is", on the title.
As Bigbill already pointed out, no amount of repair work will change the "date of manufacture".
|
|
|
Post by schweetcruisers on Jul 5, 2014 5:26:35 GMT -8
I hear this a lot since I rebuilt mine from the frame up, my argument is and will remain, how do people who resore cars get away with it? They replace floor pans, fenders, 1/4 panels, rebuild the motor, reupholster the interior, new paint and it's still a '57 chevy.
|
|
|
Post by bigbill on Jul 5, 2014 6:49:59 GMT -8
People are way to hung up on titles and most that are don't own or have never restored anything. Why can't we just look at something and say " Wow that is cool,I sure would be proud to own it". I go to shows with one of my cars and hear someone bad mouthing a car in the show then later I see then get in a total pile of S*** and drive off, they don't even have a nice daily driver.
|
|
SusieQ
Global Moderator
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 1,197
'62 Shasta Compact
Currently Offline
|
Post by SusieQ on Jul 5, 2014 7:29:12 GMT -8
My personal feeling is that it's a reconstructed trailer on an old frame. Technically in my state, if you reconstruct a trailer, it should be inspected and a new title assigned. Not that anyone will go to that trouble, but here is what our DMV has to say about it:
Definitions
Reconstructed Vehicle Any vehicle that has been materially altered from its original construction by the removal, addition, or substitution of new or used essential parts. (VA Code § 46.2-100)
Specially Constructed Vehicle Any vehicle that was not originally constructed under a distinctive name, make, model, or type by a generally recognized manufacturer of vehicles and which would not be otherwise defined as a reconstructed vehicle. (VA Code § 46.2-100) For example, a vehicle constructed using a Mercury frame and a Chevrolet body.
Replica Vehicle Any vehicle not fully constructed by a licensed manufacturer, but either constructed or assembled from components. Such components may be from a single vehicle, multiple vehicles, a kit, parts, or fabricated components. The kit may be made up of major components, a full body, or a full chassis, or a combination of these parts. The vehicle must resemble a vehicle of distinctive name, line-make, model, or type as produced by a licensed manufacturer or manufacturer no longer in business and is not a reconstructed or specially constructed vehicle. (VA Code § 46.2-100)
NOTE: Vehicles such as reconstructed or specially constructed motor vehicles may have existing vehicle identification numbers (VINs) that are no longer appropriate because the vehicle has been fundamentally altered to be an entirely different vehicle for titling purposes. In order to title these types of vehicles, DMV will assign vehicle identification numbers.
|
|
|
Post by bigbill on Jul 5, 2014 8:27:17 GMT -8
I think that is directed more at hot rods, street rods, and street machines/customs more than trailers.
|
|
Hamlet
2K Member
Posts: 2,820
Likes: 925
Currently Offline
|
Post by Hamlet on Jul 5, 2014 8:36:05 GMT -8
Interesting. Hamlet is more than 50% new, but to us he's still an original Compact. We may even be mistaken on the age, but it doesn't really matter to us. I figure that if I went out and spent a pile of money to "upgrade" myself, I'd still be an early 50s model!
|
|
lakewoodgirl
Active Member
Posts: 270
Likes: 92
1954 Lakewood
Currently Offline
|
Post by lakewoodgirl on Jul 5, 2014 9:54:16 GMT -8
Because DMV really has no true "rules" regarding the Vintage Trailers and it seems to be left up to the interpretation of the clerk you happen to get, the best you can go by is the Classic/Antique/Hot Rod "rules". I think until we all collectively set up our own set of rules, which should closely resemble those who restore classic cars, we have to live by DMV rules. Has anyone thought about putting this together and sending it to DMV for review? I think it's about time it's done.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
shastajeff
Active Member
Posts: 140
Likes: 63
1965 Shasta Compact - "Stu"
Currently Offline
|
Post by shastajeff on Jul 5, 2014 9:55:52 GMT -8
I suppose if you go by the VIN then it is still a 79. Maybe I'm a purist and I've tried to keep my 65 Compact as original as possible. I won't replace the icebox with a refrigerator, update the toilet or add a/c as I don't want to destroy the originality of the camper. My Compact is very nice but it is far from a brand new looking camper. Maybe my concern is somehow related to a gripe I have with the Edsel club that I belong. I drive my car to the meets and yet I compete against cars that have been trailered. How can I compete against a trailered car with a spotless engine compartment, undercarriage, etc. when I pick up dust and dirt driving the car, not to mention the chance of getting a stone chip? Unfortunatly, the club has not been responsive to a "trailer class only" category. I was able to pick up a national first place one year but only because there weren't any trailered cars in my class that year. I'm a purist when it comes to cars, too. I just hate seeing vintage cars hot rot rodded up and not kept original. I'll just consider the restore/rebuild/modify a matter of everyones personal preference.
|
|
SusieQ
Global Moderator
Posts: 4,781
Likes: 1,197
'62 Shasta Compact
Currently Offline
|
Post by SusieQ on Jul 5, 2014 11:07:56 GMT -8
I think that is directed more at hot rods, street rods, and street machines/customs more than trailers. Yes but it applies to trailers, too, especially home built ones. It's also related to restoring vehicles which have salvage titles. Also from the DMV: Titling a Vehicle in Virginia Follow these steps to title a vehicle, including trailers, in Virginia.
|
|
lakewoodgirl
Active Member
Posts: 270
Likes: 92
1954 Lakewood
Currently Offline
|
Post by lakewoodgirl on Jul 5, 2014 12:49:39 GMT -8
I suppose if you go by the VIN then it is still a 79. Maybe I'm a purist and I've tried to keep my 65 Compact as original as possible. I won't replace the icebox with a refrigerator, update the toilet or add a/c as I don't want to destroy the originality of the camper. My Compact is very nice but it is far from a brand new looking camper. Maybe my concern is somehow related to a gripe I have with the Edsel club that I belong. I drive my car to the meets and yet I compete against cars that have been trailered. How can I compete against a trailered car with a spotless engine compartment, undercarriage, etc. when I pick up dust and dirt driving the car, not to mention the chance of getting a stone chip? Unfortunatly, the club has not been responsive to a "trailer class only" category. I was able to pick up a national first place one year but only because there weren't any trailered cars in my class that year. I'm a purist when it comes to cars, too. I just hate seeing vintage cars hot rot rodded up and not kept original. I'll just consider the restore/rebuild/modify a matter of everyones personal preference. I like your style Shastajeff! I too am a bit of a purist. I come from a classic car restoration upbringing so I guess it's in my blood. I have a total appreciation for the others but, restoration is where my heart is. And, I don't mind any imperfections that cannot be "polished" out, my trailer earned it! With that being said though, I will be making one change to my trailer that the manufacturer, IMO, made a mistake with to start with. The original color of the vinyl seats is a horrible piss yellow color, that is going to be change to a different period correct color! It's the most disgusting color ever and one I cannot live with! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
|
John Palmer
Senior Member
Hi, From a vintage trailer guy located in Santa Ana, CA. It's good to see lots of activity here.
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 576
Currently Offline
|
Post by John Palmer on Jul 5, 2014 15:44:20 GMT -8
Because DMV really has no true "rules" regarding the Vintage Trailers and it seems to be left up to the interpretation of the clerk you happen to get, the best you can go by is the Classic/Antique/Hot Rod "rules". I think until we all collectively set up our own set of rules, which should closely resemble those who restore classic cars, we have to live by DMV rules. Has anyone thought about putting this together and sending it to DMV for review? I think it's about time it's done. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk The only thing the DMV is concerned about is collecting money! Or as they like to call it, USE FEES!
The only reason they would like to call it a new, or reconstructed vehicle is so they might be able to establish a new value that they could use as a "higher base" to use to obtain fees from you. In our state it's 8% of the selling price for a "license use tax/fee". Obviously 8% of $20K to $30K, is more than 8% of $200. to $300. It's not about what it's called, it's about how your state is going to collect more money from you.
You would be wise to have the license, and title transferred as soon as you purchase your new "pile of junk", then keep it currently registered, and not have to deal with the friendly DMV.
|
|